The Supreme Court has once again reminded Americans that digital privacy is the kind of quaint notion best left in textbooks. With no explanation, no debate, and no visible effort, the justices decided they didn’t feel like dealing with Harper v. Faulkender.
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve
X boss Elon Musk has announced that he regrets some of the negative posts he made about President Donald Trump on social media last week. In a post on X early Wednesday morning, Musk admitted […]
Florida’s top health official is calling for a ban on Covid injections, warning that mRNA “vaccines” are not safe for use by “any human beings.” In a bold and direct challenge to the ongoing push […]
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled that the Czech Republic violated the right to private life of a non-binary citizen by refusing to alter the gendered portion of their personal identification number […]
Be the first to comment