The Supreme Court has once again reminded Americans that digital privacy is the kind of quaint notion best left in textbooks. With no explanation, no debate, and no visible effort, the justices decided they didn’t feel like dealing with Harper v. Faulkender.
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has announced his “radical” new plans to pour tens of billions of dollars into schemes that seek to take control of Africa’s “vaccines,” food supply, and digital ID programs. During a […]
The European Commission has issued a warning to Slovakia, declaring that proposed constitutional changes backed by Prime Minister Robert Fico’s government would breach European Union law by attempting to deny the supremacy of EU rules […]
The Supreme Court declined to take up a case on Maryland’s AR-15 ban, allowing the state’s Democrat leaders to continue throttling the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding American citizens. The court’s denial raised objections from […]
Be the first to comment