Ninth Circuit Panel Finds California Open Carry Ban Unconstitutional

Please follow & like us :)

URL has been copied successfully!
URL has been copied successfully!
Ninth Circuit Panel Finds California Open Carry Ban Unconstitutional
URL has been copied successfully!

Original Article By AWR Hawkins

A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled Friday that California’s ban on open carry of handguns runs afoul of Bruen (2022) and violates the Second Amendment.

The Los Angeles Times noted that the panel issued a 2-1 ruling in which Trump appointees Lawrence VanDyke and Kenneth Kiyul Lee voted in the majority.  George W. Bush appointee N. Randy Smith was the dissenting judge.

VanDyke wrote the opinion for the panel, noting that California’s ban–which was adopted in 2011–fails the Bruen test, which requires modern day gun controls to be demonstrably supported by founding-era law and intention.

He wrote, “The historical record makes unmistakably plain that open carry is part of this Nation’s history and tradition. It was clearly protected at the time of the Founding and at the time of the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

VanDyke also pointed out that open carry is the “default lawful means” of carrying a firearm in a majority of states around the Union.

KCRA pointed out that the Ninth Circuit panel let California’s open carry permit requirement stand, but not without criticism, noting, “California admits that it has no record of even one open-carry license being issued, and one potential reason is that California has misled its citizens about how to apply for an open-carry license.”

California can appeal the ruling, asking for the Ninth Circuit to hear the case en banc.

Views: 9
Please follow and like us:
About Steve Allen 2493 Articles
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.