Days Away: The TAKE IT DOWN Act Creates a Censorship Mechanism With No Safeguards

Please follow & like us :)

URL has been copied successfully!
URL has been copied successfully!
The TAKE IT DOWN Act Creates a Censorship Mechanism With No Safeguards
URL has been copied successfully!

Article By Dan Frieth

The law Congress unanimously passed to fight revenge porn also handed anyone with an internet connection and a grudge a delete button.

The Federal Trade Commission sent letters to 17 major tech companies this week, warning them to comply with the Take It Down Act by May 19 or face fines of $53,088 per violation.

Amazon, Alphabet, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, TikTok, X, Reddit, Discord, Snapchat, Pinterest, Bumble, Match Group, Automattic, and SmugMug all got the same message from Chairman Andrew Ferguson.

We obtained a copy of the letter for you here.

“We stand ready to monitor compliance, investigate violations, and enforce the Take It Down Act,” Ferguson wrote.

Reclaim Your Digital Freedom.

Get unfiltered coverage of surveillance, censorship, and the technology threatening your civil liberties.

“Protecting the vulnerable, especially children, from this harmful abuse is a top priority for this agency and this administration.”

The law, signed by President Trump in May 2025 with strong backing from First Lady Melania Trump, requires platforms to delete non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII), including AI-generated deepfakes, within 48 hours of receiving a removal request.

Platforms must also find and remove identical copies, provide clear notice about the removal process and let people track their requests. The FTC published a business guidance page alongside the letter spelling all of this out. The definition of “covered platform” is broad enough to capture social media, messaging apps, video sharing, gaming platforms, and essentially any site hosting user-generated content.

Nobody wants revenge porn circulating online. But the law Congress passed is far broader than the problem it claims to solve.

The TAKE IT DOWN Act borrows its structure from the DMCA’s already-controversial notice-and-takedown system, then strips out the safeguards.

Under the DMCA, a takedown request must include a statement under penalty of perjury. False claims can result in liability. There’s a counter-notice process so the person whose content was deleted can push back. TIDA has none of this. There’s no penalty for false claims, no counter-notice, no requirement that the filer prove anything before content disappears. A platform gets a complaint, has 48 hours, and deletes. That’s the entire process and exactly why the Take it Down Act introduces a new censorship mechanism.

The law defines a violation as involving an “identifiable individual” engaged in “sexually explicit conduct,” without defining that conduct narrowly.

More: The Take It Down Act: A Censorship Weapon Disguised as Protection

Political speech is vulnerable too. A deepfake of then-candidate Trump kissing Elon Musk’s feet went viral before TIDA took effect. There was no nudity or explicit content but under the TIDA’s language, that satire could be classified as NCII and deleted.

A meme recasting Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz as characters from Dumb and Dumber was already pulled from Meta for being sexual in nature. Anyone with a form and a grievance can file a request and platforms facing five-figure fines per violation will delete first.

The law also applies to messaging platforms, some of which offer end-to-end encryption. If a platform can’t see message contents, it can’t scan for NCII or find “known identical copies.” Complying with the law as written means breaking encryption or scanning content before it gets encrypted. The FTC’s letter doesn’t address this and the law doesn’t carve out encrypted communications.

Enforcement sits entirely with the FTC.

The law passed the House 409 to 2 and the Senate unanimously. Nobody voted against protecting victims of revenge porn because that’s how the bill was sold.

What Congress built is a takedown system with no safeguards against abuse, enforced by a politicized agency, applicable to encrypted communications, and designed to make platforms censor first and think later.

Views: 4
Please follow and like us:
About Steve Allen 2849 Articles
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.