Australia Abruptly Shuts Down Covid ‘Vaccine’ Sa…

Please follow & like us :)

URL has been copied successfully!
URL has been copied successfully!
URL has been copied successfully!

In a move that has sparked outrage among medical experts, lawmakers, and participants, Australia’s Queensland Health has suddenly shut down one of the world’s largest real-world studies comparing Covid “vaccinated” and unvaccinated individuals and ordered the complete destruction of all samples and critical data.

The state’s health officials permanently shut down the QoVAX Safety and Efficacy Trial (QoVAX-SET).

However, the reasoning behind the sudden destruction of all data was not clear.

The announcement came in a letter to participants, in which Metro North Health stated:

“There is no longer a scientific and public health need to retain these biological samples for future study.”

“These samples will be appropriately sterilised and disposed of,” the letter continued.

“All study data… will be archived… [but] will not be accessed or used for any future purpose.”

Critics, meanwhile, say the move is nothing short of scientific sabotage.

Notably, QoVAX was one of the only major global studies with access to a “comparison set” of individuals who had been “vaccinated” but had never contracted COVID-19.

This data pool is considered invaluable to understanding “vaccine” efficacy and potential long-term side effects.

The study included 10,000 adult participants, both vaxxed and unvaxxed, from “86% of Queensland’s postcodes.”

Scientists had collected over 100,000 biospecimens and 11 million data points.

Major institutions — including QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, the University of Queensland, QUT, James Cook University, and Griffith University — contributed to the project.

The study was defunded in 2023 with no official explanation.

The decision derailed the nearly complete research and triggered public backlash.

Since then, a growing chorus of lawmakers and scientists has questioned the state government’s motives.

Senator Gerard Rennick, an outspoken critic of the mass Covid injection rollout and advocate for vaccine-injured Australians, took to Parliament to demand answers:

“Why has the Queensland health department withdrawn funding for its award-winning QoVAX research program studying the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines?” Rennick said.

“QoVAX rapidly enrolled over 10,000 participants…

“The team collected not just basic health data, but also environmental, genomic, and immunological data that could help us understand how these novel mRNA and DNA vaccines affect the immune system.

“Instead of answering vital questions about why highly vaccinated countries like Australia saw such high excess mortality and long Covid rates, the government has chosen to shut down the only study that could deliver real answers.”

QoVAX Director Professor Janet Davies called the decision “incredibly disappointing,” underscoring the study’s global importance.

Senator Malcolm Roberts was even more blunt in a Facebook post:

“Losing the last evidence that could inform a truly objective assessment of the effects of the injections wouldn’t just be a tragedy — it could be a crime.

“I’m putting Queensland Health bureaucrats on notice: do not destroy these samples and evidence.

“Allow the study to complete so that the data can be shared for all Australians.”

Despite the massive scale and participation, all physical evidence will now be sterilized and discarded.

While the data will be legally archived, officials say it will never be accessed or used, effectively burying any possibility of full, independent analysis of Australia’s Covid “vaccine” response.

For many, the destruction of such a rare and robust dataset only confirms what skeptics have long feared: that governments would rather bury the truth than confront it.

READ MORE – Japan Issues Global Alert as Excess Deaths Surge Among ‘Fully Vaccinated’

Views: 9
Please follow and like us:
About Steve Allen 2493 Articles
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.