Original Article By David Hawkins
A Utah courtroom erupted into controversy after the judge overseeing the Tyler Robinson murder case ordered the defendant’s parents and brother to leave the room during a closed session, rejecting a direct plea from the accused Charlie Kirk-killer’s attorney and intensifying scrutiny on how the high-profile proceedings are being handled.
The Thursday hearing marked Robinson’s first in-person appearance since being charged with assassinating conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University earlier this year.
The brutal killing that shocked the nation is now moving toward a possible death penalty trial.
Robinson entered the Provo courtroom in civilian clothing but remained shackled.
He appeared calm, even smirking at times, as cameras captured his demeanor.
His family, who have attended each stage of the proceedings, sat quietly in the gallery until the judge signaled the transition into a restricted discussion.
At that point, the defense made a rare request.
“Mr. Robinson has some immediate family members who are present, his father, his mother, and his brother,” the defense attorney said.
“And we would ask the court to permit them to remain in the courtroom during the closed portion of the hearing.”
Prosecutors quickly objected, arguing that the upcoming discussion involved sensitive security matters.
“My only concern with that, your honor, is that we’re going to be talking about court security measures,” the state told the judge.
“I don’t know that we’ll have to go into a lot of detail about that, but I do have concerns about those issues being discussed in public.”
The judge pressed the defense for statutory grounds to justify the exception.
Robinson’s attorney conceded the decision was squarely in the court’s hands.
“I think it’s subject to the court’s discretion to decide who is and is not an appropriate member of the public,” the defense responded.
“They have a unique relationship with Mr. Robinson and they would certainly abide by any orders… but obviously it’s up to the court.”
Moments later, the judge delivered the ruling that sent Robinson’s family out of the courtroom.
“I’m going to rule that they will be excluded as well,” the judge said.
“Given the nature and the sensitivity of it, I believe it is appropriate to treat all parties in the public equally, though I do recognize their relationship with Mr. Robinson.”
WATCH:
The order immediately heightened tensions in a case already defined by battles over secrecy, access, and public visibility.
Both sides have sparred over media restrictions, with prosecutors citing security concerns while defense attorneys warn that limiting transparency risks undermining Robinson’s right to a fair trial in what has become one of the most closely watched criminal cases in the country.
Prosecutors have confirmed they intend to pursue the death penalty if Robinson is convicted of aggravated murder.
Robinson was arrested roughly 33 hours after the shooting, reportedly following encouragement from his parents and a retired detective to turn himself in.
Until Thursday, he had appeared only via video from the jail.
His live appearance in a Provo courtroom drew a significant media presence and renewed national interest in the case.
Robinson’s legal team continues to argue that heavy coverage threatens to taint the future jury pool, while news organizations insist that any restrictions must be narrowly tailored and that the public has a right to observe proceedings involving a nationally televised assassination.
The case now heads toward a series of pretrial disputes that will determine how much the public sees and when, as prosecutors move forward with one of the most consequential death penalty prosecutions in modern Utah history.
Be the first to comment