The Supreme Court has once again reminded Americans that digital privacy is the kind of quaint notion best left in textbooks. With no explanation, no debate, and no visible effort, the justices decided they didn’t feel like dealing with Harper v. Faulkender.
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve
Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala has joined a growing bloc of European leaders demanding greater national authority to deport foreign nationals who commit crimes, aligning with an initiative led by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni […]
In a baffling scientific development that has researchers scratching their heads, a NASA-backed experiment in Antarctica has picked up strange radio signals coming from deep beneath the ice—signals that defy the known laws of particle […]
A group of scientists has just issued an explosive warning after discovering the presence of “magnetic nanoparticles,” which penetrate the brain and “manipulate thoughts,” in the bodies of people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.” Alarmingly, […]
Be the first to comment