The Supreme Court has once again reminded Americans that digital privacy is the kind of quaint notion best left in textbooks. With no explanation, no debate, and no visible effort, the justices decided they didn’t feel like dealing with Harper v. Faulkender.
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve
Experts are sounding the alarm about a newly surfaced 2024 biodefense report outlining a chilling bioterrorism plot against the United States. The report details a “fictional” bioterror attack scenario scheduled for July 4th, 2025. It […]
During a segment on FOX29’s Good Day Philadelphia, longtime co-host Mike Jerrick unexpectedly found himself the subject of the story when a guest doctor diagnosed him with skin cancer live on-air. Dr. Joanna Walker, a […]
As many as 80 percent of Poles say they will limit their spending, with most saying this will cut purchases of electronic equipment or furniture, one expert tells Rzeczpospolita, cited by the Do Rzeczy news […]
Be the first to comment