Undercover Report Exposes Major Failings in Alaska’s Voting System as Fake Names Accepted Without Proof

Please follow & like us :)

URL has been copied successfully!
URL has been copied successfully!
Undercover Report Exposes in Alaska’s Voting System as Fake Names Accepted Without Proof
URL has been copied successfully!

Article By David Hawkins

James O’Keefe of the O’Keefe Media Group released an undercover video from Alaska’s August 18 primary election showing poll workers offering questioned ballots to individuals who provided false names connected to Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) without presenting identification.

At one polling location, O’Keefe gave workers the name Brian Murkowski, identified in the report as the senator’s brother, and said he had left his identification in his vehicle.

“The last name is M U R K O W S K I,” O’Keefe said.

“I left my wallet in the vehicle.

“Would it be possible to vote without it?” O’Keefe asked.

“Absolutely possible,” a poll worker replied.

The worker later told O’Keefe, “You can vote if you’d like to. Do you want to do a question ballot?”

O’Keefe responded in part, “I mean, all I got to do is do the question ballot, then I can vote.”

Worker Located Murkowski Name on Voter Rolls

According to the undercover report, election workers located Brian Murkowski’s name on the voter rolls.

O’Keefe said he did not check in under the name, sign election documents, or cast a ballot.

At a separate Anchorage polling location, another O’Keefe Media Group operative provided the name Karina Waller, identified as Murkowski’s state director, while also saying no identification was available.

According to O’Keefe Media Group, the worker confirmed that the individual was at the correct polling location and offered a questioned ballot.

Alaska Law Allows Questioned Ballot Without ID

Alaska law generally requires voters to present identification before voting.

Under Alaska Statutes Section 15.15.225, acceptable identification can include a voter registration card, driver’s license, state ID, passport, birth certificate, hunting or fishing license, or certain documents showing the voter’s name and current address.

Election officials may waive the identification requirement when they personally know the voter, subject to restrictions involving certain first-time voters.

But the statute also explicitly states that a person unable to produce identification “shall be allowed to vote a questioned ballot.”

That ballot is completed like a regular ballot but is placed in a separate envelope and subjected to additional review before election officials determine whether it should be counted.

The O’Keefe report highlighted that provision while demonstrating how the process operates in practice.

Report Raises Questions About Point-of-Vote Verification

The undercover interactions show that a person who provides a name appearing on Alaska’s voter rolls can be offered a questioned ballot without producing identification at the polling place.

The state instead relies on a later administrative review to determine whether the ballot should ultimately be accepted.

O’Keefe Media Group also reported that Brian Murkowski’s name remained on Alaska’s voter rolls despite the group’s claim that he no longer resides in the state.

Voter roll maintenance is handled separately by the Alaska Division of Elections.

Murkowski Defends Opposition to SAVE Act

Before the undercover report was released, Murkowski’s office provided O’Keefe Media Group with a statement defending her position on voter identification.

“Senator Murkowski has consistently supported the requirement of photo ID to vote, and earlier this month she voted in favor of a separate measure on the Senate floor to do just that,” Murkowski’s office stated.

“However, the Save America Act is an overly burdensome one-size-fits-all mandate from Washington.

“It would be impossible to implement in time for this election and would likely disenfranchise thousands of eligible Alaskan voters.

“In any case, voter impersonation is a crime and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

Murkowski has opposed the federal SAVE Act, citing concerns about imposing uniform documentation requirements on Alaska’s remote and rural communities.

She joined Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) and several other Republicans in blocking the legislation ahead of the midterm elections.

O’Keefe’s undercover report now puts renewed attention on Alaska’s existing system, where identification is generally required but voters who cannot produce it may still receive a questioned ballot pending later verification.

Views: 3
Please follow and like us:
About Steve Allen 3,192 Articles
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.