Canada’s Stringent Gun Controls Did Not Prevent High School Shooting

Please follow & like us :)

URL has been copied successfully!
URL has been copied successfully!
Canada’s Stringent Gun Controls Did Not Prevent High School Shooting
URL has been copied successfully!

Article By AWR Hawkins

Canada’s stringent gun controls, including a freeze on the purchase of handguns, did not prevent Tuesday’s heinous mass shooting at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School.

Moreover, the male alleged shooter, who was transitioning to female, used a handgun despite the freeze on handgun sales and transfers.

According to the Guardian, police indicated the alleged shooter used a handgun and a long rifle. The type of long gun has yet to be made public by police, but the Associated Press noted, “The Canadian government has banned more than 2,500 makes and models of assault-style firearms in recent years.”

The ban includes “more than 1,500 models” of firearms then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made illegal on May 1, 2020.

None of this stopped the shooter from having a long gun.

FEBRUARY 11: An infographic titled “Mass shooting in Canada” created in Ankara, Turkiye on February 11, 2026. (Photo by Elif Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Canada has a firearms license requirement, but the alleged shooter lacked a valid license. He had a license that expired in 2024, according to police.

Canada also has a red flag law yet, even though the alleged shooter was known to police, he was able to have two guns in his possession on Tuesday.

Ironically, the Guardian noted that “Police had attended the suspect’s family residence on multiple occasions over the past several years, dealing with mental health concerns of the suspect.”

Two years ago “firearms were seized…[from the alleged shooter’s home] under the criminal code,” but the “lawful owner of those firearms petitioned for them to be returned, and they were.”

Views: 11
Please follow and like us:
About Steve Allen 2768 Articles
My name is Steve Allen and I’m the publisher of ThinkAboutIt.online. Any controversial opinions in these articles are either mine alone or a guest author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the websites where my work is republished. These articles may contain opinions on political matters, but are not intended to promote the candidacy of any particular political candidate. The material contained herein is for general information purposes only. Commenters are solely responsible for their own viewpoints, and those viewpoints do not necessarily represent the viewpoints of the operators of the websites where my work is republished. Follow me on social media on Facebook and X, and sharing these articles with others is a great help. Thank you, Steve

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.